In a galaxy like the Milky Way, the light comes entirely from a compound of luminous stars and glowing gas. Nevertheless, in an active constellation, the energy output is extremely high to assign to these factors alone. The excess energy is focused in the galaxy’s heart — its ongoing galactic nucleus.
Active galactic nuclei (AGN) are found throughout the cosmos in many forms. Some hide within seemingly normal galaxies, while the brightest pump out so much energy they outshine their host galaxy entirely. AGN are manifestations of the supermassive black holes found in nearly every galaxy we see, and they have played an important role in shaping the universe.
Observations of galactic nuclei had turned up odd results since the early 1900s, but originally gained little attention. By the late 1950s, astronomers scanning the sky with radio telescopes were trying to match radio sources with visible objects such as stars and galaxies. They found that while many optical counterparts were normal-looking galaxies, some appeared as bright blue stars often rooted in fuzzy halos barely observable in the wash of light from the star.
These oddballs, initially dubbed “radio stars” and later “quasi-stellar radio sources,” persisted mysterious until 1963, when Dutch astronomer Maarten Schmidt recognized the starlike counterpart of radio source 3C 273 from Palomar Observatory in California. He reviewed the source’s spectra, spreading out the light by wavelength to identify features associated with the radiation and consumption of energy by various atoms.
Poring over the results, Schmidt recognized a series of traits correlated with hydrogen — as if the features had been shifted as a group to redder wavelengths. This phenomenon, named redshift, happens when an object recedes at great speeds, making the wavelength of its light to shift toward the red end of the spectrum. The hydrogen lines Schmidt observed had been shifted by an amount corresponding to a redshift of 0.158, placing 3C 273 roughly 2 billion light-years away. But if the 13th-magnitude “star” really was so distant, it must be radiating at least 100 times brighter than a normal galaxy.
Shortly afterward, astronomers returned the spectrum of a different radio star, 3C 48, and identified features associated with a redshift of 0.3679, corresponding to a distance of over 4 billion light-years. Measurements of more quasi-stellar objects followed, all extremely distant. Soon after, the term quasar was invented. By 1973, a paper by Jerome Kristian in The Astrophysical Journal settled that “all quasars occur in the nuclei of giant galaxies.” They seem starlike because they are so bright that the galaxy around them cannot be easily perceived.
More classes pop up
Not all AGN are so dramatic. In 1943, Carl Seyfert reported several nearby, normal-looking spiral galaxies with unusually bright nuclei. Their hearts displayed high-energy discharges that could not come from stars. Galaxies like these are immediately called Seyfert galaxies; their AGN are only a fraction of the owner galaxies’ total light.
Many AGN emits X-rays, showing up in studies of those wavelengths. Astronomers also find AGN sparkling in infrared light, as their high-energy emission is absorbed by dust and re-emitted at longer wavelengths.
Most active galaxies are variable, so astronomers can discover them by taking images of the same region of the sky some time apart. Their visible light flickers over months or years, while their X-ray emission can vary over hours or days. Changes on these short timescales narrow down both the mechanism powering the AGN and the size of the region they can occupy, allowing researchers to answer one key question: What powers them?
Powering the turbine
After the discovery of 3C 273, astronomers introduced ideas for energy sources that included blasts of star formation or supernova, and exotic options such as supermassive stars, huge pulsars, or supermassive black holes.
In 1969, Donald Lynden-Bell pointed that the gravitational potential energy around a black hole with a mass of 10 billion Suns and squeezed into space 10 light-hours across could more than the record for the energy outputs of quasars. He debated that matter falling at varying rates into black holes with a range of masses could explain all AGN, from low-energy Seyfert galaxies to high-energy quasars.
Astronomers now believe supermassive black holes reside in the centers of nearly all galaxies. Accretion onto these black holes in the “central engine” powering AGN. Infalling matter builds a swirling accretion disk as it approaches the black hole. As material moves from the outer disk toward the event horizon, its gravitational potential energy is converted into radiation across the spectrum. Not all galaxies are considered active, though, even if the black hole is feeding. But if there’s enough accretion, we see AGN.
NASA/DOE/Fermi LAT Collaboration
What turns the generator on? As galaxies assemble and form stars, there is a wealth of material in the core ready to feed the black hole, firing a quasar. Over time, however, that fuel runs out, and the quasar shuts off. Compared with the lifetimes of galaxies, the “active” lifetime of a quasar is short and occurs early in the galaxy’s development. Even after being turned off, AGN can be reactivated if interactions — galaxy mergers or close flybys — funnel material inward toward the supermassive black hole, restarting accretion.
“The evolution of quasars and the evolution of galaxies look very similar, and they’re very closely linked,” says Patrick McCarthy, staff scientist at the Carnegie Institution for Science and vice president of the Giant Magellan Telescope Organization. Indeed, the greatest number of quasars is located at the same time most galaxies in the universe were forming the bulk of their stars, between redshifts 2 and 3. There are no quasars closer than 600 million light-years, meaning none still exist today. Closer AGN are not quasars, but lower-luminosity Seyfert galaxies.
A unified theory
The unified theory of AGN explains their different properties through adjustment effects. It states that all AGN are the same type of object observed from different angles, and all share similar features, whether they are visible or not.
Each active galactic nucleus begins with a supermassive black hole, typically defined as an object with 1 million solar masses or more. Its event horizon is light-hours across. Just above it is the accretion disk and a hot, spherical corona of gas. These open a few light-days across. At a distance of about 100 light-days is a region of fast-moving gas. About 100 light-years out, the AGN is enclosed by a torus — a doughnut-shaped ring of dust and gas that can hide portions of the central engine from view, depending on the angle it tilts with respect to Earth. Beyond the torus, about 1,000 light-years out, is a region of smaller slower-moving gas clouds.
Some AGN own fast-moving jets, which are thought to result from magnetic fields close to the black hole. The jets can stretch outward for hundreds or even thousands of light-years, spewing material at close to the speed of light.
The angle at which we see AGN determines their classification. Looking directly down the barrel of the jet reveals a blazar. The two major classes of Seyfert galaxies differ only by whether both the fast- and slow-moving gas clouds can be seen, or if the torus hides the former.
But astronomers believe brightness does stem from intrinsic properties, including the amount of fuel available and the rate at which the black hole consumes that fuel. Different accretion modes, or types of accretion, are believed to generate more or less radiation, accounting for the range observed. “There are accretion modes that produce a lot of luminosity at high energies in the visible, X-ray, ultraviolet, and then there are other accretion modes that can accrete a fair amount of matter but not have a strong radiative signature,” says McCarthy. “One of the areas of interest is trying to understand how those different accretion modes switch on and off … [and] when they’re producing a lot of external radiation, how long do those episodes last? Is there just one big flash, or are there multiple episodes?”
The discovery of supermassive black holes inside galaxies brought other revelations. The mass of a galaxy’s supermassive black hole is correlated with certain properties of the galaxy’s central regions, such as its total mass and the velocities of stars in the bulge. These links suggest that galaxies and their supermassive black holes form and evolve together, somehow affecting each other despite their vast difference in scales.
NASA/CXC/ Ohio State University/J. Eastman et al
One of the things we learned about the evolution of massive galaxies is in order to reproduce the properties we see — the colors, the stellar ages — the key is not so much getting the star formation to turn on, but turning it off, and turning it off fairly abruptly and fairly early so the galaxies age quickly enough and the ellipticals look essentially like dead sources,” says McCarthy. AGN feedback is one possible way to shut off star formation. Winds or jets from AGN inject energy into the galaxy’s center, heating the gas so it cannot collapse and form stars. This “can pretty rapidly and quite globally in a sense shut down star formation throughout a massive galaxy,” says McCarthy.
But how such massive black holes form in the first place is perhaps the biggest unanswered question surrounding AGN and galaxy formation to date.
“I think, in a sense, one of the aha moments was the recognition that nearly all galaxies have massive black holes in their centers, and that there’s roughly a fixed fraction of the galactic bulge mass in the black hole mass,” McCarthy says. “And then it makes sense that galaxies and black holes, or galaxies and AGN, co-evolve. But it begs the question, then, of which came first: the black hole in the center of the galaxy, or the galaxy and then the black hole formed. So that’s one of the frontiers.”
Active galaxies have changed the way astronomers think about the universe and the way galaxies within it grow. Their bright beacons have shaped the cosmos and still serve as powerful tools for understanding its properties across time.